Rails and orchestration
One integration. Route across processors and rails without hard-wiring a single vendor.
You have a processor to replace, a rail to add, a ledger that has to balance, and a date you gave someone. We bring engineers who have shipped this before and a library of the parts nobody should rebuild. You keep the processor contract, the spread and the code. We are paid to build it, a monthly fee to run it, and a fee from the processor we wire in — which we tell you about first.
Own the router, rent the rails.
You have a cutover date, a processor migration, a rail to add, a ledger that will not balance, or a payment feature that routes volume and earns nothing.
If you are shopping for a general technology partner, this page is the wrong door. If you have a funded payments project and a date, keep reading.
Client-owned payment layer between your product and example processors/rails. Futurify owns routing, reconciliation, and onboarding — not funds.
Illustrates how a client-owned layer can route across example processors and rails without hard-wiring a single vendor.
Scenario: Card via Adyen — primary card path through the layer to Adyen (example).
One integration. Route across processors and rails without hard-wiring a single vendor.
Insert-only double entry where it matters; exceptions with an owner; export that finance can trust.
Replace the processor, add a second rail, move merchants onto a platform model — without a second discovery project.
Surcharge / dual pricing that survives tax, financing attach, payout speed. You keep the spread.
Gap analysis against a real standard, with evidence, then a fixed-price remediation scope.
Illustrative ops view only. Insert-only double entry where it matters; exceptions with an owner; export that finance can trust.
| ID | Type | Rail (example) | Owner | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount mismatch | Adyen | Ops · Maya | ||
| Processor settlement differs from platform capture by $0.03 — FX rounding. Ops confirms ledger insert; finance reviews export. | ||||
| Late credit | Interac | Ops · Ren | ||
| Bank rail credit posted after cutover window. Queued for next-day match against Interac (example) remittance file. | ||||
| Duplicate event | Stripe | Eng · Kai | ||
| Duplicate Stripe (example) webhook retry. Layer deduped event log; confirm merchant ledger was not double-posted. | ||||
Named defect list against a standard or live system.
Fixed price, milestone invoiced. You own the instance, configuration, data and event log. Futurify owns the reusable core under a perpetual licence for you to run it.
Monthly fee per account: exceptions queue, connector updates, new rail onboarding. Priced per account, per month — ask for the current ladder.
If a processor pays us a referral or integrator credit, you hear it before we recommend them.
Futurify is not a payment service provider, a payment facilitator, or a holder of funds. The layer runs in your perimeter under your provider agreements. A second processor is wired into every build.
Fixed fee for the scope. Milestone invoiced.
Monthly fee per account for operating what we built. Until a public Run ladder is published after the first signed Run, ask for the current ladder—we do not invent a number here.
Fixed fee for conformance and remediation.
Some processors pay Futurify a referral fee, listing, or integrator credit. We disclose that before we recommend a processor. Integrator credits pass through to reduce your invoice.
Your payments margin. Custody of funds. Float or yield on your customers’ money until counsel clears that question. Exclusivity that locks you to one rail.
We had the pleasure of working with Tri and his exceptional team. They delivered high quality solutions on time and were instrumental in modernizing our infrastructure.
Futurify's professionalism contributed significantly to our initiatives. Their dedication to execution, verification and validation was above and beyond what we expected.
Working with the Futurify team has been an exceptional experience. They are always available when we need them and consistently deliver high quality work on time.
Futurify demonstrated exceptional professionalism, technical expertise, and industry knowledge. A phenomenal partner who is proactive and responsive to our needs.
Straight answers for platform and payments leads evaluating a client-owned orchestration build. Related: build vs buy · reconciliation · hosted alternatives.
No. Futurify is an independent software vendor. We build and run a payment layer that sits in your perimeter, under agreements you already hold with processors and banks. We are not a PSP, a payment facilitator, or a holder of funds. There is nothing to unwind on the money side if you replace us.
It means we do not take custody of customer money, settle merchants, or sit as the licensed party on the rail. Your processor and bank relationships stay yours. The layer routes, records, reconciles, and operates the software path. The funds path stays with the providers you contracted.
Platforms and ISVs that already have a funded payments project and a date: replace a processor, add a rail, ship a ledger that balances, close a reconciliation gap, or monetise payment volume without hard-wiring a single vendor. If you are shopping for a general technology partner with no cutover date, this page is the wrong door.
Processors move money. The payment layer sits above them. You keep the processor contract. A processor change becomes a configuration change rather than a second discovery project. We wire a second processor into every build so you are not locked to one rail.
Many orchestration products are multi-tenant SaaS: you integrate to their cloud, they hold the routing product, and your leverage sits inside their contract. Our default is client-owned: the layer runs in your infrastructure, you own the instance, configuration, data and event log, and you keep the processor relationships.
Three things, in order: Build — fixed price, milestone invoiced, for a scoped cutover or layer. Run — monthly fee per account to operate what we built (ask for the current ladder; no invented public number). Partner disclosure — if a processor pays us a referral or integrator credit, you hear it before we recommend them.
You keep your payments margin. We do not take a share of it as the core model. Build and Run are engineering fees. Some processors pay Futurify a referral fee, listing, or integrator credit when we introduce a qualified platform and do the integration. We disclose that before we recommend a processor. Integrator credits pass through to reduce your invoice where that is how the credit works.
Yes. That is a common trigger: a dated cutover, merchants to move, settlement reporting that has to carry your business identifiers, and a day-one plan for what stays live. The layer is provider-agnostic so the next processor is not another greenfield project.
Insert-only double entry where it matters. Exceptions with a named owner. Exports finance can trust. The point for a platform is knowing which payment is unmatched, who owns it, and what the provider record says—without a weekend archaeology project when support tickets arrive.
The layer is built to route across processors and rails without hard-wiring a single vendor. Canadian platforms often need cards plus bank rails (EFT/PAD, Interac e-Transfer) rather than card checkout alone. Which rails ship in your build depends on your scope and the providers you hold. We do not publish a bank partner list on this page.
You own the instance, configuration, data and event log. Futurify owns the reusable core under a perpetual license for you to run it. You keep the processor contract and the spread. We never register as your payment provider.
Tell us what you are integrating and the date it has to land. No pitch deck. No claim we cannot source.
No pitch deck. No claim we cannot source. Bring the processor, the rail, and the cutover date—we will tell you honestly if a client-owned payment layer is the right build.